![]() ![]() The best results were achieved by Avira, Kaspersky Lab, McAfee, ESET and Microsoft ab. Thus all the products in this test category received between 5 and 6 points. That is somewhat annoying in an individual case, but given the volume of files, it is still a good rate. When scanning the 1.2 million files, the error rate was a maximum of 11 files. When installing and launching normal applications, there were a few false positives here and there. All the products worked error-free in this area. The result is consistently good, especially in detecting the websites. Thus, the packages were supposed to respond accordingly. The special feature in this test: all the websites, applications and files were clean – not a threat. In the test, 500 websites were visited, programs were installed and launched, and 1.2 million files were scanned. That is why for each solution, the lab examines whether false positives occur frequently. Users are typically shocked if a red alarm window suddenly pops up when launching a normal application or surfing a favorite website. Is this a real alarm or only a false alarm? All additional packages were considerably more conspicuous in everyday use in terms of performance loss: AhnLab, Avast, ThreatTrack, Comodo, Microsoft, ESET and K7 Computing received a mere 4.5 or 4 points. The protection packages from F-Secure and McAfee did not require vast resources, but they did need more: 5.5 points. All the packages earned 6 points for their performance. The best scores in this test were achieved by the suites from Avira, Bitdefender, BullGuard, Kaspersky Lab, Microworld, Symantec and Trend Micro. Naturally, every security suite required a few percentage points of resources – but it was not to exceed that level. The same test PCs without a security solution deliver the reference values. Afterwards, applications are launched, websites are visited or files are copied and the amount of time required to do so is noted. To verify this, the technicians in the lab install each solution on a standard and a high-end PC. Users continue to complain that the security solution they are using slows down the PC. Despite minor errors, ultimately 10 products scored the coveted 6 points in this test category. In addition to the 5 products from AVG, Bitdefender, F-Secure, Kaspersky Lab and Symantec, there are also G Data, Trend Micro, Avast and ThreatTrack. Overall, however, there were additional products in the test with the reference set that also achieved error-free detection. ![]() Whereas the first 5 also achieved the 100 percent mark in the test with the reference set, Comodo fell short because it overlooked a few known threats. In the real-world test, 6 products managed to detect all the threats without exception: AVG, Bitdefender, F-Secure, Kaspersky Lab, Symantec and Comodo. So the packages were expected to be familiar with these threats. By contrast, in the reference set there were 12,000 old acquaintances that were already wreaking havoc up to 2 weeks prior to the beginning of the test. In the first section, the goal was to fend off 175 new, still unknown threats, some of which were only a few hours old. In the test for protection, the packages were required to withstand the real-world test, followed by the AV-TEST reference set. ![]() The remaining products from ESET, ThreatTrack, Comodo, K7 Computing and Microsoft came in at 15.5 and 15 points. The large midfield with 16.5 and 16 points is made up of products from AVG, F-Secure, G Data, AhnLab, Avast, BullGuard, McAfee and Microworld. They also receive the additional TOP PRODUCT rating. ![]() This is followed by the products from Bitdefender, Symantec and Trend Micro with exactly 17.5 points. In addition to the certificate for tested safety, the products also received a TOP PRODUCT rating, as they scored more than 17.5 points. Avira AntiVirus Pro and Kaspersky Internet Security. A total of two products managed to achieve the top score in the test. In each test category, the solutions received up to 6 points, i.e. The lab evaluated the 18 solutions in March and April 2017 in the categories of protection, performance and usability. All the known products on the market are found in the test list. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |